Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [IEEE1904.1] Proposed agenda is posted

Duane,

 

Good point. I will wait for proposed editors’ responses to see how many editorial comments were re-classified as technical. Based on the final number of technical comments, I’ll rearrange the clauses as you suggested.

 

Glen

 

From: Duane Remein [mailto:dremein@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 9:01 AM
To: Glen Kramer
Cc: STDS-P1904-1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [IEEE1904.1] Proposed agenda is posted

 

Glen,
I share your concern that we will not have enough time to review all comments.  With that in mind, I would suggest that Cl 1-3, 5A & 9A be deferred until Day 3.  These clauses contain informative material and do not warrant the same level of attention at this point in the process.  This may not save much (only a few technical comments) but it does set precedence and focus our attention to truly technical details.
Best Regards,
Duane


On 12/8/2010 12:12 AM, Glen Kramer wrote:

Dear Colleagues,

 

We have a total of 743 comments received against D1.0.

 

The comment break down by clause is shown below.

 

Clause

Technical*

Editorial

Total

0

0

3

3

1

0

12

12

2

1

1

2

3

1

9

10

4

8

3

11

5

33

20

53

6

45

30

75

7

8

2

10

8

87

47

134

9

97

38

135

10

59

18

77

11

34

9

43

12

90

20

110

13

62

6

68

 

525

218

743

(* The number of Technical comments is likely to further increase, as editors are required to reclassify Editorial comments that propose technical change into Technical comments.)

 

A note on editorial comments:

At the meeting, we will try to accept all editorial comments in bulk. Accepting in bulk means that resolutions to all editorial comments that editors proposed will be accepted by a single motion. To make sure that no wrong or undesired changes are made to the draft, it is important for everyone to review the editorial comments and the proposed resolutions. If you have any disagreement or a concern about the proposed resolution, please inform Chief editor that the comment in question should be discussed individually and not processed in bulk. Hopefully, there will not be too many such cases.

 

 

A note on technical comments:

It will be very challenging to resolve 525 technical comments (available meeting time only allows 2.5 minutes per comment on average), while ensuring that due technical consideration is given to each comment.

Considering that it is quite likely that we will not have time to resolve all comments, I suggest that we organize our comment resolution such that we at least cover one key clause for each task force. This way, even if we run out of time, at least we will have a number of completely resolved clauses that will allow us to produce D1.1 (at least for these clauses), while the rest of clauses and remaining unresolved comments will simply carry over to the next draft.

 

Therefore in the proposed agenda, I ordered clauses as follows:

 

Day 1:

C5 and 5A

C6 and 6A

C9 and 9A

C0-C4 (if we have time, otherwise move to later days)

Day 2:

C8

C12

C10

Day 3:

C11

C13

C7

 

The proposed agenda is posted here: http://www.ieee1904.org/1/meeting_info/siepon_1012_agenda.pdf

As always, I welcome all suggestions for improvement.

 

 

Thank you,

Glen